Ministry of Justice slams ‘baseless’ ADHOC report on court hearings
Buth Reaksmey Kongkea
The Ministry of Justice has refuted allegations and claims made by the
Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC) on its “Hearing
Monitoring Report” released on Tuesday.
The unverified report alleges that based on a study conducted by ADHOC
members from January 2022 to July 2023 many irregularities had happened at the Capital-Provincial
Court of First Instance the Provincial-Capital Courts across the country.
Chin Malin, Secretary of State and also the Spokesman at the Ministry
of Justice, told Khmer Times yesterday, “I found three problems with the
report: it is inaccurate, baseless and cannot be taken for consideration. Most
importantly, the ADHOC observers failed to understand the hearing procedures of
the courts and it was not clear whether they have consulted or verified the
report with experts.”
Malin said, “If the ADHOC team had found out erring judges, prosecutors
or clerks who failed to comply with law or code of conducts for court hearings
procedures, they should provide the information with specific details to the
Ministry of Justice so that the ministry will inspect or take legal action
against them.”
Chin Malin picked up one of the ADHOC’s report related to pretrial
detention of accused for more than six months and explained that regarding the
pretrial detention of accused, in fact and in accordance with Criminal Law
Procedures, for a criminal case, it is authorized to delay the pretrial detention
of accused over six months or up to six months twice.
In its 16-page report, the ADHOC has highlighted postponement of
hearings, pretrial detention for more than six months, difference between the
time set in the judgement and time of the actual trial, the accused right to know
the reason and charges against them, explaining the rights of the accused, the
right to call and question witnesses, the rights during interrogation and ban
on torture, presumption of innocence, court discussion and decision, disallowance
of exculpatory witnesses to testify, independence, impartiality and conduct of
judges on stakeholders and so on.
Comments